InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 635
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/08/2018

Re: eightisenough post# 358131

Wednesday, 10/27/2021 10:50:49 AM

Wednesday, October 27, 2021 10:50:49 AM

Post# of 425778
Eight
I have clear recollection also of posting by Jl that he had raised with POSA that they had misinterpreted statistics? in their assessment of Mori and this challenge by JL led to reassessment by POSA
Sorry I can’t be more specific it’s all a long time ago ... but it does not relate to the discovery of the Mori statistical errors by the academic statistician (name escapes me but he posted all detail on this board- he was quite brilliant ) the Bhatt paper took up this cudgel
The JL issue and the Bhatt issue re Mori were quite different

I agree with you that Amarin were quite wrong not to take up Rule 60- whilst they were perusing other litigation to get patents restored it is beyond belief that they did not take the Rule 60 route also
Amariin /it’s lawyers were at fault for not totally fine tooth combing all the studies in play in the patent trial and a smart statistician employed to check the stats in these studies could have had huge impact on Mori - same applies to being blind to the K study tactics
Given they were a one product company and their world depended on it they should have spent every cent / followed every line of attack / every detailed analysis of studies in the trial proper and then by god worked every angle (rule 60 included) to restore the patents when they were Du blown out of the water
Marjac we all hope will work a miracle
Tuesday and his reply is out
Let’s hope the FC gives this traction
Hope all well with you and family
Alm
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News