This is exactly why I asked someone with real world experience for their opinion on the advantages of ZIMHI instead of asking someone with no experience in this matter to provide their "factual feedback" without having a basis for their "facts". But there a valuable takeaway here...
Josey, how important is that extra 2-3 minutes when attempting to save someone's life from an OD of Fentanyl? Do you think ZIMHI would have been advantageous as a first dose in those scenarios?
And apparently of equal importance, how dangerous do you (yes, only Josey again) as a trained professional feel it is to be using needles to administer life saving medications? Are there not possibly dozens of medications already administered by needle on an emergency basis for everything from stroke and diabetic shock to various cardiac emergencies? Or are EMT's inherently afraid of using needles to save a patient's life?
Thank you again for any valuable feedback you might provide.
Message in reply to:
I watch Cops so I am somewhat of an expert (JK!) in these matters as they constantly apply narcan via nasal spray to 'victims'. If the product isn't effective in the first 2-3 minutes they can give additional doses up to a certain limit I believe.
Is there enough of difference between the 4 and 5 and the way in which it is applied (nasal vs injection) to justify incorporating the risk and training to us a needle out in the field, forget about the red tape in city, state and Fed government. Maybe the market is currently providing us with that answer.
This is factual feedback and not feedback to fit to a certain narrative b/c I am desperate to be right that it's all sunshine and rainbows. I do not have blinders when it comes to investing.
Maybe all our eggs are in one basket now...Tempol.
