I believe that if Billy's attorneys were defending him against fraudulent management of UOIP they wouldn't (of course) need to inform the court if they knew he was guilty....their job is to get him off or mitigate his punishment. If, though, in the course of litigating the patent case for UOIP they became aware of information that implied Billy's nefarious conduct - from unofficial sources - they could later claim ignorance. Or surprise. Pretty much the same thing as plausible deniability. WHAT? Billy Carter? Defrauding common shareholders???????? OMG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHO KNEW??????????????????????
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.