InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 58677
Next 10
Followers 73
Posts 5803
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/02/2009

Re: HDtexas2003 post# 44653

Wednesday, 10/06/2021 11:07:29 AM

Wednesday, October 06, 2021 11:07:29 AM

Post# of 58677
That would be sweet. Realistically though, I have my reservations about Lilac.

That just seems too big. They have so much Investment already, through Gates et al, and now the $150 Mil funding they have raised through T Rowe price, and many others. Venture with Lake Resources. ($50 Mil Investment) Doesn't it seem now like they would be more apt to go Public through an IPO? Their meteoric rise to fame, and public through little ole CUBV? I don't know, hope I am wrong.

Snydacker also said in his interview that they have no "immediate" plans to go public...maybe later, or something like that. Unless he's gaming us, and knew in his mind that his answer was correct because he was thinking about October?

A lot has happened on the timeline since the original Lilac Tweet.

Don't mean to present a dissenting opinion, but I don't feel we should get our hopes up and be dashed by disappointment if it's not Lilac. Other Lithium prospects seem more realistic to me, which would lead us MUCH higher anyways.

I keep presenting a few possibilities, because any one of them will be a huge win, imo.

hl

cubv