InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 171
Posts 63487
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 12/05/2006

Re: lentinman post# 8809

Tuesday, 01/30/2007 5:32:21 AM

Tuesday, January 30, 2007 5:32:21 AM

Post# of 14027
Lentinman
That's flawed logic.
There's not enough evidence to support "scam".
It's not proven. It IS obviously very much suspected.

It is libelous terminology and crosses into a grey area
where Freedom of speech dictates "imo" must be used
to avoid it being libelous.
Therefore, it is still only an opinion and not fact.
Currently, our opinions differ possibly because I
require stronger evidence. This also means that IF said
evidence were actually produced, my opinion would change.

A scam imo, is criminal and illegal. This can require proof
beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil case, the burden of
proof is less, being which is more likely than not.
Currently, there is not even enough evidence to meet the
requirements of a civil case and prove GFCI is a "scam".

Therefore, my logic is not flawed.

Even if the necessary evidence became available, my logic
would still hold as it allows for it to be introduced and
I can change my opinion. The same goes if GFCI produces
evidence which exonerates it as an investment.
Therein lies our difference of opinions.

Imo, the concept of God offered by xtians is a scam.
This is a null hypothesis.
It is neither proven nor disproven.
Again, it is merely my opinion partially based on all the
genocide, death and destruction accomplished in the name of
God by xtians. Same goes for Allah, imo.
So until I see a white bearded buy in flowing robes
sitting on a throne deciding if I descend to Hades,
I'm not accepting that premise either.






My opinion is just that, my opinion.
So make no investment decisions based on my opinion.

#board-9931