InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.31
(
-0.10%
)
Bitcoin
63,761.16
(
-0.75%
)
Post# of 96904
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Scruffer

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 21
Posts 2302
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/19/2017

Scruffer

Re: None

Sunday, 09/26/2021 12:54:33 PM

Sunday, September 26, 2021 12:54:33 PM

Post# of 96904
Let me put all this nonsense to rest.

The suit is against WILLIAM R. CARTER, JR., an individual, TOO.

California State court is fine. Plus, moves faster and cheaper.

Moreover, Carter must hire a California licensed attorney to respond (at least that's my understanding) by Oct 3rd.

Deirdre has arbitration hearing on Oct 1st about "Sale" of patents to Carter anyway.

This should all be moot. There was no expiration so interest accumulates.

And, of course, stuff is in the hopper.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up