Enzolytics Inc (ENZC)

[foxi]

Agreed. Maybe he thought he still controlled the 71M shares and didn't bring a lawsuit earlier, expecting to profit. Doesn't excuse his questionable actions after.

ENZC's item 57 from the list and I imagine they have convincing material to support it:

57. In the context of a claim for tortious interference with contractual relations, a plaintiff must allege facts showing (1) a valid contract, (2) about which the defendants have knowledge, (3) an intentional act by defendants that is a significant factor in causing the breach of the contract, (4) done without justification and (5) which causes injury.

Whatever else Savov claims, it sure seems like he'll have trouble defending against this. ^