You are right in terms of trading and making a profit. That's what the hypers and haters are doing on every message board. Those of us long-term shareholders want to see the science approved by the world, which is when they will be getting a signed contract. It ain't going to $30-$50 before an Amazon or an Intel confirms over whatever timeframe they need that it is the sh-t they need.
When it was $16 on pure love of Dr. L's video, the great predictors here were saying it was ready for the rocket to launch. It fell back to the $6's. Many years ago when the stock crossed $3.00, the experts here told us it's going to $100 very soon. Ask those of us that owned it then, how soon, soon is?
I have never challenged the management team or the GOO material since day 1--almost 17 years or so ago. I also believe thanks to Lebby's updates that we are very close to the proverbial finish line. If anyone here is sure that if we don't get a contract for the next year, that we will not go back down appreciable lower, than they can read the future better than most of us.
Unlike some of the "experts" here, I never wanted to see the share-price come lower, even some wanted it back to a dollar. I always said I will once an order is given to us, because this is still such an esoteric stock/category that if we had to buy it a 2x whatever it is at that that time, I would sell whatever I owned, including (in jest) my wife's second unneeded kidney, to buy whatever I could. Even at $20 or $30 when that day happens (please soon) it will be a steal.
So yes, until we have a signed financial contract, again unless you are a trader trying to time it, or make short term profits (risking a fortune) we have nothing until we have everything. Not having revenues now means nothing to me. The only thing that matters in the disruptive technology that the world needs to be recognized, not with a piece of glass award, but by a commercial entity that steps up and gives us the first of what will be many contracts.
