InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 13277
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2016

Re: Porch Honkey post# 71584

Sunday, 09/12/2021 3:45:46 PM

Sunday, September 12, 2021 3:45:46 PM

Post# of 79868
THE HELL HE WAS!!!!

The case never went to trial.

Only one probable reason for that - an out-of-court settlement.

It's highly doubtful the plaintiffs admitted to filing wrongful suits and paid the defendants for their trouble and expenses. The defendants would have insisted it go to trial if the plaintiffs had filed fraudulent suits.

It's far more likely that Steve-o paid the plaintiffs the $60k stolen from each one, as well as attorneys fees, expenses and probably punitive damages too.

Harrington certainly didn't want any part of the corruption that Stevie drug him into!

And it's probably not a coincidence that Stevie's investment company shut its doors around the same time the case was closed.


Which is why shareholders should be demanding to see the settlement agreement - to see if the CEO of their investment is a crook who paid his way out of a GUILTY OF FRAUD judgment that might prevent him from holding an executive position in a public company or associating with penny stocks, like some other penny stock crooks were ordered to stay away from:

Pursuant to Section 20(g) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(g)] and Section 21{d){6) of the Exchange Act[15 U.S.C. § 78 u{d){6)], bar **** from participating in any offering of penny stock; and

VII.

Pursuant to Section 20(e) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)] and Section 21{d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78 u(d)(2)], bar **** from serving as an officer and director of a public company,