InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 635
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/08/2018

Re: north40000 post# 354171

Sunday, 09/12/2021 3:27:04 PM

Sunday, September 12, 2021 3:27:04 PM

Post# of 426341
North kiwi - Marjac
I have read it (as a lawyer)and it’s not at all good ...it is simply brilliant - outstanding
The rule 60 is unanswerable - the rule 24 is where the wrong panel could allow the injustice to stand but -The right panel allowing standing and the rule 60 to be heard and the generics will loose ...
no one should right this off -the response of the generics will be very interesting because thus far they addressed only rule 24 (to Du) and not the substance of the matter as set out in rule 60 application and brief
Dare they ignore this aspect this time and just try to swing the Rule 24 out of jail card ????
Their danger is that if the FC panel read all the material ( as clearly never happened in the Du FC appeal) the hollowness of any attempted defence on the rule 60 material will be completely damning -
- if they don’t respond to the rule 60 - that is because they know they are blown out of the water

There response is due in a few weeks

Marjac and the team have shown their incredible skill and determination -their efforts can not be praised too highly
Alm
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News