My idea is that when one owns property one finds the best use scenario. In other words, which of the patents holds the most long term profit and which do not. Now, if they need expansion capital to advance selected properties maybe they sell off some of the less valuable properties but to sell the whole thing and miss out on the big long term payoff when so much work has been invested in the various patents, processes and relationships and considering the CEO and everyone I see in pictures that are runnung this company are in their 30's it makes sense to me to milk the cow rather than sell or butcher her. Additionally, I do not want to see a buyout because I have 10 cannabis stocks of which 2 sold out their hot properies but stayed in business or at least stayed listed, that is to say the original stock was still listed but had then nothing of real value left, and I got $0 for my investment. Now they both lie dead, flatlined for years. Yeah they might make a comeback but on what?
FEATURED North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM
HealthLynked Expands Telemedicine Nationwide • HLYK • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM