InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 164
Posts 8922
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 05/28/2005

Re: EOT post# 39374

Thursday, 08/26/2021 12:31:11 PM

Thursday, August 26, 2021 12:31:11 PM

Post# of 51960
EOT, I don’t think many people realize that once the XUDOZER signs the SBES shell over to Rocky SaaS, XU is no longer in control. RockySaaS is a newly spun off entity from Panshi. Rocky needs to assign a CEO and C-Suite officers and possibly Board members. A deal needs to crafted and signed off by both parties.

This assessment from a poster on another board makes perfect sense as to how this may play out! wink

Could be a dual listing. A listing here (OTC) first would make sense, as it would create greater company liquidity… which in turn would allow them to raise more capital in a home country IPO. Historically, dual listings that have an IPO in the home country follow this pattern as a means for fund raising. Reverse merger into the OTC also makes sense in this scenario because it has way lower up front cost. If this is the method, I would be looking at OTC launch, the Shanghai IPO, then uplisting US with greater valuation from the IPO after the year timeline is up. Each bounce would raise the valuation of the company, allowing for greater fund raising and higher multipliers.



We have heard rumors of a dual listing and I believe this to be the path that Rocky Saas will take with the full blessing of institutional investors and the provincial government. It’s all about transparency, notification, approval and execution! wink. Git ‘er done and let ‘er run!

All we need is confirmation that the deal is done .... the powers in control of SBES/ Rocky SaaS will make sure they make tons of money!

GLTS SBES!

Cheers, Red