Grifco Inc (GFCI)

[Trinityz1]

B2L
Tag, you're it!
It was basic IF-THEN.
Of course, your snipping removed some context.
That's not nice.

----------------------------------------------------------
here's the complete thought again:
After some checking, it could end up proving beneficial
news when it gets settled. Of course, there's always a big
chance of it getting settled and no news breaking about it
if a nondisclosure agreement is part of the settlement
which is likely to happen even when the settlement is in
GFCI's favor.
----------------------------------------------------------

If you read my entire post, I'm questioning the assumptions
made by bashers who I definitely now believe have an agenda.
I know it makes me want to stick this out to the end.
If the goal is to make longs sell out, imo, it's having
the exact OPPOSITE effect on many of us.

Can you tell me, WHO moved the case into Federal court?!?!?!?!?
Can anyone here say WHO did this?
I'd like to know.

That one piece of information is CRITICAL to how any of us
might view this lawsuit. Without knowing that one piece,
bashers have no right to make any assumptions
and neither do those who are pro-GFCI.
All any of us can do is guess.

Notice the words I used, like "could"
You can substitute the word "IF" for "when"
(even when(IF) the settlement)
if that helps your comprehension.

I didn't say GFCI would win, just what one possibility is.
I.e. IF GFCI wins through settlement, then
Will we get to know about it or not?

I'm unhappy with SP, but math is math. 1+1=2.
The things not adding up are starting to pile up.

There's a conundrum here that begs to be solved.
The more GFCI gets bashed and especially with the same old
things, the more it makes me want to stick it out.