InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 200
Posts 25129
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: MI Dendream post# 397154

Friday, 08/20/2021 7:27:01 PM

Friday, August 20, 2021 7:27:01 PM

Post# of 732765
We have the judge’s decision from early 2017, dismissing the court case that could have been filed again if those material facts had changed in the intervening period, but they did not file again, and the judge confirms that they had no interim efficacy review. Not sure they would have been unblinded under that anyway. I think the judge explains that they would not be unblinded.

It is not really clear how the claims that they are effectively unblinded are anything more than speculation, and perhaps speculation because the blinded results are just so good that they therefore must know as we all know, how good DCVax must be… and so, they are “unblinded”… maybe that’s the argument…? Though that is clearly not unblinded either. They’d need to know each patient got what and when… there is no indication they ever had that information.

There is only speculation that they can’t be blinded based likely on inaccurate ideas about what they must know … they made everyone’s treatment from the beginning. I am sure they took care not to cause inadvertent unblinding.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News