InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 1502
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/03/2005

Re: mouton29 post# 24513

Thursday, 08/12/2021 8:04:57 PM

Thursday, August 12, 2021 8:04:57 PM

Post# of 29335
I’m waiting for somebody to come out with a scheme for harvesting H2 from nuclear waste/fuel rod storage/cooling ponds. Radiolytic hydrogen generation would be relatively clean and seems like it could be cheap. Turns waste into a resource. I’m sure the usual screaming meemies would get butthurt about such a thing so I don’t see it happening.

Also, re the 3.5% CH4 loss: that seems extraordinarily high. If it were true, there would be a lot more dead oil/gasfield workers due to H2S poisoning. I suspect this is another case of lies, damned lies and statistics. The writer has created the impression that the 3.5% loss is at the production point whereas if the number is real, it is the total from production thru the processing and distribution chain. That difference is important cuz the screaming meemies go with the 1st impression and want more rules and regs at the production point while ignoring the rest. Doesn’t accomplish much except for higher prices.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.