Vinmantoo, You can continue buying into the mainstream BS vaccine narrative if you want, and I'll continue to be a skeptic.
But as a scientist, where is your scientific skepticism? You didn't try to refute the actual information of Malone-Weinstein-Kirsch or McCullough, but instead try to attack them personally. Resorting to the ad hominem approach indicates that since you can't refute their actual information, you go after their character.
That's weak, but is typical of the current headlong push for a 'vaccine jab in every arm'. Forget the truth or any contrary evidence, just keep jabbing the overpopulated world with the experimental gene modification therapy. Is it just a coincidence that the bioaccumulation data (Dr. Byram Bridle) shows that the cleaved off spike proteins (which aren't 'supposed' to cleave off) are accumulating heaviest in the ovaries? I don't know, but it sure would seem to justify a closer examination.
As a scientist you should know the importance of examining ALL the evidence and data, and not cherry picking and going into it with blinders on and brain in 'switched off' mode.
