Amazing that we are still debating this and that some of you, to this day, are still denying they conducted an efficacy IA in 2015. It's ridiculous. She told us they were going to do one. It would have been completely irresponsible and negligent for them not to have done one. And, yet, some of you still think they did not. Why? Not because you have any evidence to suggest they didn't (whereas, yes, there is evidence they did and no denial from the CEO), but because you don't want to believe they did one because it destroys your whole narrative. And don't try to tell me about lawsuits that did not address the issue of an efficacy IA conducted in 2015.
The "Super Duper Double Secret Probation Efficacy IA" conducted in or around 2015 is central to this whole mess. It's a key piece of information that was withheld from shareholders, and I can tell you right now it is what is going to hang them in court when this debacle blows up. They disclosed the safety IA but not the efficacy IA? Hmmm, perhaps they will need to explain that one to the court.
It's all very interesting that they dragged this out another six years (at least) and made how much money? Would love to know how much the CEO has pocketed between 2015 and now off the notion that DCVax-L might work. I can tell you it's a lot of money. And I can tell you that the whole time she's been making that money she's known a lot of things about this trial that she hasn't shared with shareholders. Despicable, unethical, and disgraceful are the first words that come to mind.
