InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 561
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/10/2020

Re: tele55 post# 24679

Wednesday, 07/14/2021 4:05:55 PM

Wednesday, July 14, 2021 4:05:55 PM

Post# of 48106
Why didn't they prosecute this methodology (in-house testing) the first time around??

This seems redundantly obvious to me so I'd be interested if they really submitted their ELD device for cert without pre-testing in-house.

The PR implies that they did not do in-house testing before submitting the first time; since they only decided to do in-house testing on the reprogrammed device (I.E. the one that was re-submitted after initial rejection)...


From PR (https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MJLB/news/Ultrack-Completes-Reprogramming-of-Their-DriveLineELD-Product-and-Provides-ELD-Certification-Update?id=309702):

Ultrack has decided to perform these tests in-house before submitting our reprogrammed DriveLineELD for certification.



This seems like an extreme oversight, thoughts?