Atacama Resources International Inc (ACRL)

[Tiresias]

Paragraph 1 of the Background to the CTO incorrectly stated that the Issuer was in default
of filing its annual audited financial statements, annual management’s discussion and
analysis, annual information form and certification of the annual filings for the year ended
31 December 2015, and its interim unaudited financial statements, interim management’s
discussion and analysis and certification of the interim filings for the interim periods ended
31 March 2015, 30 June 2015 and 30 September 2015.
4.

What communication? What this likely means is this...the regulator in preparing a stronger case against the issuer is ensuring they have their information aligned to ensure no hiccups. So after an internal review they have decided to eliminate the one year and added three years of defaults. This seems to be the regulator getting its information together for future actions. It does not say upon an application by the issuer-this was done by the regulator is my opinion. Nothing in there states Atacama contacted the regulator. Prove to me I am wrong by showing they applied for this? If they applied for it the information would be on SEDAR. It is not. LOL.

If this is good news, why is the company not announcing by way of a press release they have applied for, and received a variation order? Why does this always come not from the company? Why would the company not use this to reassure Canadian investors they are working? This would be big news for the new team but it seems they had nothing to do with it. This is bad news, not good news imo.

I have a train to catch, enjoy the day.