InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 5678
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/28/2014

Re: ACRL_AuEgg post# 42232

Monday, 07/12/2021 1:28:48 PM

Monday, July 12, 2021 1:28:48 PM

Post# of 48984
you stated...

NONE OF WHICH HAS YET EVER BEEN SUBSTANTIATEDD WITH ONE SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE

the omission of fact under securities law is a violation. What they don't say can be held against them.


Here is a list of some violations under securities law:

Atacama will trade on the Nasdaq-not allowed to say that
Assay results posted from a non-compliant source, naming the company-not allowed
Atacama stating how much their shares could be worth in the future-not allowed
Atacama will trade on the TSX-not allowed to say that
Atacama stating purchasers of their preferred shares cannot lose-not allowed to say that