I know this is a "taboo thread", but wouldn't the lawyers representing the shareholders know what the situation is, and couldn't they tell their clients where things stand?
Seems PACER isn't necessary if there are shareholder lawyers at the table. They have an absolute duty to tell their clients what's going on.
So somebody (on this board) knows what's up. If there is a deal today, a shareholder can tell us.
That is, if they are at the table. If they aren't, then............
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.