Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

That's right, the SCOTUS, doesn't want to be seen by the 330 million Americans as simply basing their opinions on political affiliation BUT RATHER ON THE RULE OF LAW AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.

Breyer posited to Hashim, "Now, one thing Conservators and Receivers DON'T DO IS GIVE AWAY ALL THEIR WARDS PROFITS TO THE UST!" Sotomayor posited to Hashim, "Is it okay for the fhfa to sell the companies to itself for $1?"

I think Roberts (since the hanging chad case and subsequent sharp divide in the 330 million Americans view of the appropriate place for government in their lives) has been promoting a theme amongst his colleagues for narrow rulings on issues that are 9-0,8-1,7-2 instead of broad sweeping changes. On the other hand, sometimes the issues and rule of law in front of them calls for sweeping changes that can be 6-3,5-4.

It wouldn't surprise me that if Breyer agrees that the nws was an ultra vires act and is void via the APA, that Breyer could write the majority opinion. On the other hand, I think Gorsuch writing the majority opinion would be most beneficial to the "evil banksters/evil hedge fund guys" like you and me. HeeHee.

We should know shortly....