Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Robert from yahoo bd]

I'd love to see the bulldozer here, but I think the SCOTUS uses it very infrequently (no wonder the US Congress feels free to write all these laws that allow the 4th Branch of government to possibly infringe on the Liberty of its citizens, since the SCOTUS will fix, edit, and rewrite the statute after 12.75 years or so!). With the bulldozer, I don't think the SCOTUS would be asking any governmental official if they want to ratify the nws simply because all the fhfas actions for the last 12.75 years would be void. But the court always has many options to choose from.

From what I understand, there are 3 regular Joe Plaintiffs, and I am assuming that they didn't have the 10's of millions to bankroll a David v Goliath fight with a hostile Uncle Suggy. I suspect BA or Pags is writing the checks that don't bounce.

Also I believe that the ACTUAL CLIENTS, here Collins, Marcus, et.al, ARE TECHNICALLY THE ONES WHO DECIDE whether or not to settle or to continue litigating, but of course BA or Pags can tell them go ahead but I'm not bankrolling it anymore unless you do what I suggest.