Cytodyn Inc (CYDY)

[stockorus]

Yes, that was what gave the 24%. Now they are changing it to 31 after stating they had some "new findings". I agree it does not make sense that they should discover new deaths suddenly in the same 62 patients. My only way of justifying this would be if deaths happened on Day 28 which were originally recorded as after Day 28; and later Cytodyn after looking through the details decided they should have been recorded in the 0-28 timespan.

Too much guesswork here, but I wouldn't jump to concluding they were manipulating data or method as "new findings" just for the heck of it. No real need to change 24 to 31 at this point unless they really had something "new" in the mortality data to justify this change.