true, the point is emissions reduction but some opinions like to point out both and some focus on the negatives. It's all good though, we need to hear all sides, makes for a healthy debate and doesn't turn this into a pumper board.
my opinion is that former management put out some incredible numbers that are now tough to live up to. Since we can't turn back the clock, we can only hope that the current management provides PR's that are fact based...even if it is not what we want to hear.
I think that additional testing is being performed and we need to wait for those results. Reducing emissions by 5% in a brand new engine is marginal at best....we need to see what the tests show for 3-5-10 year old engines...then we will have a better idea of what we should name this ship...could be either the starship enterprise or the titanic...at this point your guess is as good as anybodies...
Do your own research and make your own decisions.