InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 1267
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/24/2015

Re: Biobillionair post# 40628

Tuesday, 06/01/2021 7:01:12 PM

Tuesday, June 01, 2021 7:01:12 PM

Post# of 141026
Agreed.

My GUESS is AMC approached SEC with the results from 1st count showing excess with intent to file lawsuit, hip pocketed it, and in cooperation with the SEC scheduled the 2nd count (under auspice of "delay") as not just a verification of the results for evidence value, but as a huge short trap because the behavior had continued so blatantly and excessively between first and second counts. Think a nail in the coffin setup. Determining where the system break is/are (DTCC? HF/Broker?) for accountability and restitution would have to come into play as well during that investigation.

In addition, what it did was it allowed for evidence collection, rules passage, defensive measures, research of logs, collective complaints/leads to SEC to increase, whistleblower reviews, community education on the subject, determining the W5H (Who, What, Where, When, Why, How), and following the money flow responsibilities/accountabilities when things go off script from HFs plans of strategic bankruptcy of a target and instead themselves; as the hunter becomes the hunted scenario.

There is so much aligning in the puzzle pieces already to be able to get a basic idea of where this is headed. While it can still squeeze just on visible metrics, the level of panic might be gauged by the count(s). Depending on count results, it will range from no big deal (it's just a regular transparent squeeze) all the way to catastrophic corruption threatening the market and need for major rules/laws/systemic overhauls.

Only time will tell at this point where this rockets final destination is.

All imo of course.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMC News