InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,127.79
(
1.26%
)
US TECH 100
17,446.00
(
2.17%
)
Dow Jones
38,675.68
(
1.18%
)
Brent Oil
82.77
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
63,732.40
(
-0.25%
)
Post# of 96901
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

BrokeAgent

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 3726
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2017

BrokeAgent

Re: BillyParham post# 87751

Monday, 05/31/2021 4:42:31 PM

Monday, May 31, 2021 4:42:31 PM

Post# of 96901
The appeal for the '822 upheld that portions of the patent were too vague -- the patent creators used "channel bonding" in places of the specs, rather than "RF channel bonding" that was used in other places. Overall, the patent was upheld. I think it was Cisco's intention in filing the appeal to invalidate the patent for Docsis 3.1 since they improved on the "recipe" by increasing the speed, but I believe it still uses the same technology. Adding more chocolate chips to the recipe doesn't change the recipe overall.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up