InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 2029
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/31/2017

Re: skitahoe post# 381551

Saturday, 05/29/2021 10:33:40 AM

Saturday, May 29, 2021 10:33:40 AM

Post# of 719542
Depending on how one looks at it and depending on the platform offered, UCSF could be considered peer review, albeit informal. If this were live and UCSF was sponsor to an event around that city it would require ASCO approval, likely. But, I do not believe that is the case. I do not think you can’t use an expert forum in that way, and it would not be outside regulations so long as you stuck to a reasonable review of data necessary for shareholders comprehension of the facts. While this would not fall under the purview of scientific safe harbor, details about top line data submissions for packages and necessary supporting details do not require scientific discourse for public release. I instead, think we get some good stuff to chew on in San Fran and we wait for UK to show their hand. Obviously the Queen and Crown Prince and family’s neurosurgeon has his own opinion, but lets just wait on the UK proper to make a call and for now Scotland that means you too.

You take the good, you take the bad, you take them both and there you have the facts of life, the facts of life.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News