Since this is a gambling website, I'm betting during this time of deliberation That the court will find in favor of the lady. As in the article attached A generalized dismissal like "I'm not CNN" or "Thank God we all don't cook the same" does not Adequately address the facts and arguments as presented. Notwithstanding Shaj's contribution summed up "There is no accounting for taste" which does address Opinions offered but fails on the facts offered or The science behind how those molecules for those 'tastes' got arranged. glta ;) https://www.kleinandwilson.com/publications/the-do-s-and-don-ts-of-closing-arguments/
When the jury heard this testimony during trial, the testimony seemed benign because it was mixed with hours of other testimony the defense counsel designated, presumably in an effort to mitigate the damaging admission. But when the critical testimony was played during closing argument, the jury heard it in proper context, in the proper order and without any peripheral testimony. The jury actually gasped when they heard the edited testimony in closing argument.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.