DD Support Board and Research Team

[12yearplan]

Since this is a gambling website, I'm betting during this time of deliberation
That the court will find in favor of the lady.
As in the article attached
A generalized dismissal like "I'm not CNN" or
"Thank God we all don't cook the same" does not
Adequately address the facts and arguments as presented.
Notwithstanding Shaj's contribution summed up
"There is no accounting for taste" which does address
Opinions offered but fails on the facts offered or
The science behind how those molecules for those 'tastes' got arranged.
glta ;)
https://www.kleinandwilson.com/publications/the-do-s-and-don-ts-of-closing-arguments/

When the jury heard this testimony during trial, the testimony seemed benign because it was mixed with hours of other testimony the defense counsel designated, presumably in an effort to mitigate the damaging admission. But when the critical testimony was played during closing argument, the jury heard it in proper context, in the proper order and without any peripheral testimony. The jury actually gasped when they heard the edited testimony in closing argument.