johngnatt Tuesday, 05/04/21 11:05:17 PM Re: None Post # of 339023 Some interesting cases 1. Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. Is a good-faith belief that a patent is invalid a defense to a claim of induced infringement? A defendant's belief that a patent is invalid is not a defense to an induced infringement claim. HN- WE ARE UNAWARE OF THE PATENT IS NOT A DEFENSE 2. Case 2: Suprema, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, 2015 WL 4716604 (Fed. Cir. 2015) The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, held that the International Trade Commission (ITC) has the power to exclude goods whose mere importation does not infringe a patent, but whose use by the importer directly infringes the patent at the inducement of the seller of the goods. HN- PAYING FOR A PRESCRIPTION FOR CV INDICATION DOES NOT INFRINGE THE PATENT , BUT USE BY THE PATIENT DIRECTLY INFRINGES THE PATENT AT THE INDUCEMENT OF THE PAYOR! 3. Case 3: Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., 2015 WL 4759378 (Fed. Cir. 2015) participant "conditions participation in an activity or receipt of a benefit upon performance" of the other steps and "establishes the manner or timing of that performance. HN- BY PAYING FOR GENERIC VS VASCEPA THERE RECIPR OF ECONOMIC BENEFIT UPON PERFORMANCE OF PAYING FOR A PRESCRIPTION.