InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 15841
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2010

Re: louieblouie post# 337892

Sunday, 05/02/2021 2:33:15 PM

Sunday, May 02, 2021 2:33:15 PM

Post# of 426330
Why did the Rule 24 doc contain these words:

EPADI concedes it lacks any ownership interest in Amarin’s patents



EPADI is a group of shareholders of AMRN stock, and we own the company - don't we own the patents as well, in a manner of speaking? Don't we have economic interest in in every asset AMRN has?

The timeliness excuse was lame - marjac filed within the legally allowed timeline. Not surprised one bit by this, her ruling that the EPADI was asking for impermissible new evidence to be introduced would have resulted in rejection even if all other conditions were met - this was my biggest worry from the start - Covington's failure to point out Heinecke's double speak and outright lies during the trial doomed us.

The Thought Police: To censor and protect. Craig Bruce

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News