InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 199
Posts 25122
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: Garyedward71 post# 373836

Saturday, 05/01/2021 4:58:59 PM

Saturday, May 01, 2021 4:58:59 PM

Post# of 730458
Hi Gary,

If there was no question in anyone's mind on THEIR SIDE, as managers of the business that they would not proceed with an FDA approval, based on all information, including their updated SAP, meaning, if they had failed on OS... and in fact everyone died earlier than 16 months and all their research partners were just pulling their legs on all those patients surviving... sure, they'd want to let us all know in 4 days. That would be as good as having been rejected by the FDA, but they'd have made the determination themselves that they'd get rejected, without going for a rejection officially.

This has ALWAYS been a false measure and meaningless debate because we already know what we know just from the unblinded data and that approximately 90% received the drug.

And it does not work as an axiom for determining if they will receive approval. It's a fake measure.

Are you asking me, generically, if you have a really simple trial, and it is futile, but they continue anyway only to find out, yes, it was always futile, everyone died as expected, with no difference or a difference that was not significant, with no further measures to suggest possibly otherwise, sub-cateogories, etc.? Yes, in those cases, it is wise for them to announce it asap. Basically, it as as good as an FDA rejection, just without the expense of the application process.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News