UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[BrokeAgent]

So my question is, what is included in this agreement "between
UnifiedOnline and UO! of NC. (D.I. 535 at 5)." Is this the agreement Carter signed on behalf of UOIP and again on behalf of UO!IP gifting himself 20%? Neither the IPNav agreement nor the UO!IP agreement, i.e., the 20% they each gifted themselves, should be valid. Leane signed a rescission. And as a fiduciary for UOIP, Carter was not acting in good faith. That 20% is essentially coming from shareholders who bought the 600 million diluted shares after the contract was signed between UOIP and Chanbond. It's essentially theft.