InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 203
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/31/2010

Re: None

Friday, 04/16/2021 12:04:02 AM

Friday, April 16, 2021 12:04:02 AM

Post# of 96920
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pg0vw31vyry2gak/ded-1_2015-cv-00842-00559.pdf?dl=0

Link to the ruling on the MIL
Looks like most of them went in favor of cox. Cox is concerned with apportionment. It would be to aggressive to say they are concerned about loosing and what the resultant portion of the technology this patent plays a part in to reduce the royalties to be pAid but I’ll do it Anyway. At minimum they are concerned but it would be malpractice not to imagine they would lose and take any action necessary to mitigate the damages. The judge will rule on the objections he denied if necessary at the time of trial. But usually the ruling is consistent with the logic on the order re MIL. All my HO and Experience
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.