Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Lemmiwinks]

Here is a legal question that I kind of always had but just now has it crystallized.

So the cropped table shows up in hickma’s last filing. Then is in the verdict

We could not address cause our filings and trial had passed.
How the heck does AMRN ever get to address it besides a rule 60?

Is the ability to cry foul not available on appeal because it would be new evidence? This makes no sence! When could we possibly address it? The statistics by mitre and curfmam/Bhatt I get as being new evidence. But the citing of flawed data in a ruling? Where are the technicalities I always hear about in court cases?
This is so upside down crazy it’s almost not fathomable
Lem