InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 233
Posts 26887
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/12/2013

Re: lettruthringout post# 333032

Sunday, 04/04/2021 4:41:41 PM

Sunday, April 04, 2021 4:41:41 PM

Post# of 427978

The legend is from the Kurabayashi tables in Appendix F in Rule 60 motion but is small and blurry there.


Yes the legend was not reproduce for the courts because Hikma’s attorneys didn’t want Judge Du to squint at the blurred copy. And Jay just forgot claim construction rules...over and over and over....

Certainly this was just human errors and there’s no intent or fraud....is this how Hikma should beat the fraud rap?

What Hikma and Heinecke did stinks and your flagrant/fragrant spin isn’t hiding the underlying stench of fraud. You pretend like it’s difficult to show, yet Hikma and Heinecke have constructed a record that speaks for itself.

The table was cropped out, and Heinecke kept reverting back to unapproved claim construction. Additionally Heinecke testified to the opposite of scientific fact regarding statistical significance. Was this intentional....yep...both knew that hiding facts created a false reality. (see Jays paper on this)

BB

If you're not good at being yourself, then maybe that's being yourself!

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News