InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 127
Posts 3172
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2015

Re: hankmanhub post# 366028

Wednesday, 03/31/2021 10:07:40 PM

Wednesday, March 31, 2021 10:07:40 PM

Post# of 721249
It means they’re not going to say anything definitive. I’m going to say this: The RAs in the UK and in the EU changed the protocols on their websites. This is clearly saying they’ve bought into the idea. I believe the FDA did not respond, because they do not have to. An SAP does not have to be “approved” by the FDA. I am making the assumption they did not give it a thumbs down or tell them they didn’t think NWBO should approach the data in this manner (which I think they would have done if they thought the company was about to engage in a procedure/plan that the FDA was completely against). It’s implied in the world of clinical trials that if the FDA does not respond with criticism or rejection of things that they’re in agreement, or at least are not against it. If the FDA did not respond NWBO is not going to change the endpoints on clinical trials.gov. But it almost guarantees they’ve accepted the idea.

NWBO just came out and said definitively that they changed the end points because of Pseudo-Progression and the Crossover. This is significant because it means we’re at the final bell real soon, the cards are on the table and ready to be flipped over. I see UK approval quickly. EU following, then Canada. I may be surprised but I think the FDA is watching and waiting. I think they’re going to take an extended look and will be influenced by what the UK does specifically. They’re simply more clunky than the slimmed down and streamlined MHRA. But I believe Joe Biden is in their ear. I believe it completely.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News