Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[HDGabor]

Exactly ... as I said: Mere knowledge (or willful blindness) is not enough ...

“whoever actively induces infringement of a patent shall be liable as an infringer.” ... A patent inducement cause of action has a knowledge and intent element indicated by the requirement for “active” inducement in the statute. The Federal Circuit in 2006 held in DSU Medical Corp. v. JMS Co. that the intent requirement for inducing acts of inducement required that the alleged inducer knew or should have known his actions would induce actual infringement. In addition, the inducer must have had an affirmative intent to cause direct infringement ... ... Liability for inducement requires affirmative conduct by the alleged inducer and is construed broadly

Did you "read" it, before posted ... ?