InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 306
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/17/2021

Re: None

Tuesday, 03/23/2021 3:39:08 PM

Tuesday, March 23, 2021 3:39:08 PM

Post# of 426228
Boils down to Du being a statistical naif

... and the judge's willingness to admit it

Yes, the legend was omitted, but all the intergroup "NS's" were in the table in her opinion. Are we saying she didn't know what those NS's meant?

Yes, she fell for the statement "In light of the statistically-significant differential effects reported between the EPA and control groups, a POSA
would have attributed the reduction in Apo B to EPA." but there were statistically significant differences "OVER TIME" in one group and not the other, and the end of that phrase "a POSA would have attributed the reduction in Apo B to EPA" is statistically unsound opinion rather than a statement of fact by Heinecke that was adopted by Judge Du. Admittedly, the wording is weaselly.

So, combined with her misunderstanding of what Mori really was saying, it is clear that she lacked the statistical sophistication to handle this case. Sure she had some help from Heinecke, but it was on her and it is her judicial decision. (It would have been nice if Amarin could have helped her understanding). So, is she big enough to admit here naivete?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News