Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[alm2]

Sts66- Marjac

no it does not present evidence in itself -but if Mr H is giving evidence as to what happened in the Du trial I would be tempted to try to get it admitted to show -from the very document he has created that he clearly knows the rules of scientific research and giving expert evidence - (it’s a concise written rule book written by H himself)

I would take him through each thing he did wrong in the trial and compare it line by line page by page in his rule book (that are relevant ) to demonstrate just how he crossed those lines which he sets out as sacrosanct....
it would stop him (or the generics )trying to argue out what the rules are ....

It might be a neat way to keep him on point and really illustrate how corrupt his evidence and actions were in the Du trial

In itself it proves nothing but it can be used to show he broke his own rule book
Alm