InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 144
Posts 8676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/07/2013

Re: iryokabu post# 330369

Friday, 03/19/2021 12:02:44 PM

Friday, March 19, 2021 12:02:44 PM

Post# of 425931
i-

0.001% or 1 script/year for hypertriglyceridemia? Do you still think 0.001% or 1 script/year is substantial?

Yes, definitely.

a.) Induced infringement

b.) Contributory infringement

a.) Agree, raf said differently ... as volume is necessary ("The only positive from this is that if gV were a tiny fracture of V sales, Amarin couldn't claim infringement in court")

b.) If "substantial non-infringing use" does not exist ... otherwise no infringement (any type top of direct)

Best,
G

Disclosure: I wrote this post myself, and it expresses my own opinions (IMHO). I am not receiving compensation for it.

Notice: This post is not investment advice, and not a recommendation to neither buy nor hold nor sell.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News