InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 209
Posts 32160
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

Re: Johnny_C post# 53690

Wednesday, 03/17/2021 10:03:40 AM

Wednesday, March 17, 2021 10:03:40 AM

Post# of 54032
Bullshit.
I have never said that "the Provisional Patent App was bogus and it only cost the company $199".
And I have never said that "no US provisional patent was filed".

I don't even know what this means:
"Tauriga's lawsuit was worthless, the CEO was in on it"
The CEO was in on the lawsuit against his own Company?

How wrong can one former consultant be?


Where's the nonprovisional patent application? You know that the provisional has expired, don't you, and along with it the protections that it WOULD HAVE provided?
http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&TERM1=MEDICATED+CBD+COMPOSITIONS%2C+METHODS+OF+MANUFACTURING%2C+AND+METHODS+OF+TREATMENT&FIELD1=TTL&co1=AND&TERM2=&FIELD2=&d=PG01

Just a reminder:
"On March 18, 2020, the Company announced that it had filed a provisional U.S. patent application covering its pharmaceutical grade version of Tauri-Gum™. The Patent, filed with the U.S.P.T.O. is Titled “MEDICATED CBD COMPOSITIONS, METHODS OF MANUFACTURING, AND METHODS OF TREATMENT”."
But it hadn't.


It's morally wrong to allow a sucker to keep his money.
......W. C. Fields

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.