InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 47
Posts 14105
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 01/11/2004

Re: bankjob post# 226745

Tuesday, 03/09/2021 10:15:00 PM

Tuesday, March 09, 2021 10:15:00 PM

Post# of 348596
Bah!

That WHOLE LETTER is full of untruths.

The PFR AND the recent Brief (both dated WELL AFTER THAT LETTER!) from Enforcement both underline the fact that the ONLY deficiency that was resolved from the comprehensive filing (super 10K) amendment was the language involving the ICFR statements.

The other issue of the 10Q financial numbers not being included in the “Super 10K” has NEVER BEEN RESOLVED - TO THIS DAY!!

This makes DBMM MATERIALLY DEFICIENT AND NON COMPLIANT IN THEIR FILINGS!!!

How many times does Enforcement have to tell this FACT?!

How many times does it have to be stated????

To DATE, the Division of Corp Fin’s considers DBMM TO BE MATERIALLY DEFICIENT AND NON COMPLIANT!

It’s obvious to me that the Board of Commissioners believes this to be true and it is one of the big reasons that it approved the PFR and DENIED Fritz’s Motion for Summary Affirmance!

DBMM is going down!


I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...if available, always try to present fact to back up your opinion.