Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[rapz]

Issues like Alice, non-obviousness, or abstractness, are supposed to be resolved at the initial patent examination stage. After patents are issued with valid claims, further questions about claims, Alice, etc. are resolved by the knowledgeable patent judges at the PTAB via IPR's, etc. After going through all these tests, (12 wins in VPLM case) why would anyone allow Dist Court/Fed Circuit judges that have the least understanding of patents, idea creation, the underlying technology, etc. deny patents based on Alice or abstract ideas? Why infringement cases filed in these courts somehow drag Alice or abstract ideas again to issue a judgement on claims that were already examined and approved by the US PTO? Wish someone asked Senator Tilles for an explanation.