Makes a lot of sense. When a company puts out a lot of real news in the form of real information and it turns out to be untrue or true but it never happens, it becomes very difficult and painful for some to come to terms with the reality of the facts that clearly show what is real and what isn’t. Some will often find it difficult to discern a failing ongoing business from a growing ongoing business from a business that is just hanging on. Very often they confuse the latter with one of the first two.
I’m not so sure that most of those who have theories of LQMT ‘s success buy into, what is termed the BS. They too will often express caveats in their opinions. There will always be some of course that will disagree or not believe in the failures and would rather just give LQMT a blank check to buy more time until the company actually goes belly up or succeeds.
Right now imho, the company clearly has not succeeded and due to their past and present failures at trying to sell amorphous metal, they are where they are with Li at the helm. Had LQMT been successful, there would have been no Li. Apparently all do not get this. They never understood the failures which led to the desperate agreements with Apple Eontec and others.
Although LQMT has failed so far at success. It is very apparent that they’re still trying to succeed.
As a long term shareholder your opinions are spot on. Something a few short term shareholders and a few long term shareholders too, cannot come to terms with.
In essence LQMT has not failed, they are still in business to succeed until they are not or until they do. That is how LQMT is viewed. Not in terms of failures, but always in terms of the possibilities by some of those buying into the BS.
Good luck to you.
