Thursday, March 04, 2021 10:05:08 AM
Their job is to protect investors which they have failed at miserably, not to sanction the one company that has complied in whatever misconstrued form that is being implied here. Name one other company returning to pink who has reported like DBMM has to gain such a right. Irrelevance is not justifiable to the non compliance of the very entity for which this travesty currently resides. IMVHO, the only thing holding it back now is the fact that the non protectors are buried so deep in the precedent that needs to be set, they have to rectify their own incapacities so that it never happens again. Which ultimately means clean up the shooty show. One judge just may be able to invoke such a change. We wait.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/16/2024 09:32:32 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/29/2023 09:31:08 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/17/2023 09:15:45 PM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM