InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 171
Posts 63481
Boards Moderated 9
Alias Born 12/05/2006

Re: best2listen post# 8622

Sunday, 01/14/2007 3:13:18 AM

Sunday, January 14, 2007 3:13:18 AM

Post# of 14027
well when JD gave himself super voting shares,
it's very arguable he can be included personally.
Then there's more besides that.
By arguable, I mean the defendant would argue they aren't
personally liable if so named in the documents.
They have to win that argument.

Plus, if a strategic move was made to drain all the equity,
it would be a slam dunk personal inclusion issue.

As for the warrants, record date and actual, yes, are 2
different things. However, compared to industry standard
for awarding the warrants.....is NOT sometime in the future.
A very large % actually happen in a timely fashion close
to the record date.

Perhaps, B2L, you might visit with an attorney to see
what they say. It's always good to visit with a Federal
judge at a social gathering if you happen to know one.

You have to keep in mind prevalent legal opinions.
After what happened with Enron, judges and juries
both are very sympathetic to those getting the short end.


My opinion is just that, my opinion.
So make no investment decisions based on my opinion.

#board-9931