It will “not be a problem” until there is actual judgements no matter how strong they might know the case is against them. And as noted, they cannot predict a material circumstance against them because of the amount of capital this patent suit could claim would very likely not be substantial enough to make a substantial difference in Cisco’s operational ability.
Also when was the first time we showed up in Cisco’s financial notes? I recall they did not mention this suit until fairy late in the game in comparison to Arris, or maybe I have that backwards?
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.