InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 181
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/05/2006

Re: DFW post# 6930

Saturday, 01/13/2007 10:26:23 AM

Saturday, January 13, 2007 10:26:23 AM

Post# of 38056
At least drop the 30 and 40%...I wonder concerning a RS...wouldn't the number of shares potentially going to cornell remain the same? Making a RS only really effect us and have overall limited effect?
Wouldn't the agreement have to include something to the effect that we will issue you warrants good for x amount of shares, blah, blah, and in the evnt of a RS then your warrants are divided by that RS ratio?? Seems to me we all would get RS'd but the warrants would still represent the same # of shares even after RS (when converted after the RS)...if we somehow had a forward split 2:1 (hypothetical for arguement) would the warrants be then worth double the # in the agreement???

My thinking is that a RS in the current situation would be a waste of time and without effecting future shares due cornell wouldn't change much.

Bottom line - production - sales/revenue - buy out cornell to stop the bleeding - is the neccessary (or is it mississippi) scenario that will raise the share value.

Do your own research and make your own decisions.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.