InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 1503
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/03/2005

Re: jbog post# 23587

Tuesday, 02/16/2021 7:01:35 PM

Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:01:35 PM

Post# of 29400
Pu239 and U235 arent particularly volatile but they can still make a big boom.

Lithium battery packs occupy a lot of volume and area within an EV and consequently terminal damage can be incurred from below or any side, e.g. collision from front, back or side; bottoming out on a speed bump; running over a curb; or damage from road junk can compromise a battery casing. From that point, simply running thru a puddle can cause ignition but it wont necessarily happen immediately - thus the cases where EVs have ignited while parked. With a Li fire, spraying water on the fire makes it worse and a CO2 extinguisher wont necessarily have any effect. All the necessary fuel components for the fire are within the battery. An Li battery pack could be 10 m underwater and still burn. That wont happen with an ICE vehicle.

I dont think an EV is any worse or better than an ICE vehicle wrt to ignition hazards for normal road driving but there is a different set of hazards to which most people are clueless. Little driving faux pas that some people might blow off for an ICE vehicle could be terminal to an EV. I dont think Jeep will ever make a serious off-road EV.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.